Capability roadmap and prioritization
Step 1 / 3·The Impact × Readiness priority matrix
0/3 steps done
Learning objectives — after this module you will:
- Use the Impact × Readiness matrix to prioritize capabilities
- Design a 3-wave roadmap instead of doing everything at once
- Identify quick wins that build momentum for the strategy
The Impact × Readiness priority matrix
Know how to score and place capabilities into the 4 priority cells.
After identifying 15–20 capabilities the organization needs, you CANNOT build them all at once. A two-axis matrix helps choose: IMPACT — how much does this capability affect the strategy? READINESS — how much foundation does the organization already have (trainers, data, budget, support)?
The 4 cells of the Impact × Readiness matrix
| Cell | Characteristics | Tactic |
|---|---|---|
| High impact + High readiness | Both important and doable now | QUICK WINS — do in Wave 1, build momentum and credibility |
| High impact + Low readiness | Important but not enough foundation | BIG BETS — invest in the foundation in Wave 1, deploy in Wave 2 |
| Low impact + High readiness | Easy but low value | Do lightly or let lower tiers run it themselves |
| Low impact + Low readiness | Not worth the resources | DROP — and state the reason clearly to the requester |
The 3-wave roadmap
Wave 1 (0–6 months): quick wins + laying the foundation for big bets. Wave 2 (6–18 months): big bets rolled out broadly. Wave 3 (18–36 months): future capabilities and expansion. Each wave has its own milestones and KPIs — leaders see progress every quarter.
Key takeaway: Impact × Readiness gives 4 cells: quick wins do now, big bets invest in the foundation, low-low dare to drop.
